Online Gambling Accounts

Digital accounts maintained on online gambling platforms, allowing users to deposit funds, engage in betting and gaming, and withdraw winnings. Recognized as a convenient means of storing and transferring value for recreational purposes.

[
Code
IN0006
]
[
Name
Online Gambling Accounts
]
[
Version
1.0
]
[
Category
Card-Based & Stored-Value Payment Instruments
]
[
Created
2025-03-12
]
[
Modified
2025-04-02
]

Related Techniques

  • Criminals falsify betting histories, payout receipts, and account statements on online gambling platforms to justify unexplained inflows.
  • By forging records of successful bets or winnings, they disguise proceeds as legitimate gambling returns.
  • Automated systems with weak real-time verifications fail to detect these tampered records, allowing illicit funds to be laundered through seemingly lawful gambling activity.
  • Criminals use VPNs to mask their real IP addresses when creating or logging into online gambling platforms, making it appear as though they are operating from a different region or country.
  • This allows them to deposit and withdraw funds in a manner that appears unconnected across various jurisdictions, complicating real-time AML monitoring and hindering attempts by casinos or regulators to confirm user identities and enforce location-based restrictions.
T0015.002
|
|
  • Criminals use proxies to log into gambling platforms, concealing their true location and bypassing regional access barriers.
  • Frequent proxy rotations disrupt any IP-based or geo-based pattern detection, allowing undetected fund transfers through wagering, deposit, and withdrawal activities.
  • Criminals open or access gambling platforms using transient public WiFi connections, bypassing geolocation checks that would typically flag improbable travel or repeated logins from suspicious addresses.
  • Deposits, wagers, and withdrawals from these shared networks hinder the detection of linked accounts, making it difficult to identify the actual beneficial owners.
T0015.004
|
|
  • Multi-hop VPNs allow criminals to circumvent geoblocking or regional restrictions by appearing to access gambling platforms from various locations.
  • This strategy conceals consistent deposit-withdrawal patterns that could reveal the layering of illicit funds, hampering platform-based AML safeguards reliant on user location data.
  • Criminals create multiple accounts on online gambling platforms using minimal or fabricated KYC details, making illicit deposits appear as standard player funds.
  • They place only small or hedged bets to create the illusion of legitimate gambling activity and quickly withdraw or transfer the balance as purported, legitimate 'winnings.'
  • This layering tactic obscures the true origin of the funds, especially on sites lacking robust monitoring or cross-border transaction oversight.
  • Criminals register gambling accounts using forged or stolen personal data, often evading in-person or enhanced verification.
  • Illicit funds are deposited and subsequently withdrawn as ‘winnings,’ giving such funds a legitimate appearance.
  • Continuous alteration of identity details within these accounts diminishes the effectiveness of standard anti-fraud checks.
T0023.002
|
|

Betting platforms accept aliases during remote signup; launderers cycle cash through wagers and later withdraw to bank accounts under the same alias, disguising illicit proceeds as gambling “winnings.”

  • Illicit funds cycle in and out of gambling platforms, labeled as bets, stakes, or winnings, generating a convoluted transaction history.
  • By repeatedly transferring money among multiple gambling accounts, criminals camouflage the proceeds' true source under presumed gaming activity.
  • Offshore prepaid or e-wallet balances are linked to online gambling platforms, where criminals deposit funds to obscure their source.
  • Minimal gameplay or multiple bets create transactional layers, with winnings or withdrawals then moved into different accounts.
  • This linkage leverages partial anonymity and weak verification in some online gambling sites to further conceal and shuffle illicit funds.
  • These accounts receive illicit funds masked as bets or transfers, commingling them with legitimate player deposits.
  • Weak customer identification controls in offshore jurisdictions allow criminals to convert illicit proceeds into seemingly legitimate gambling earnings, complicating AML detection.
  • Criminals deposit illicit proceeds into online betting platforms, which often have weaker face-to-face KYC controls.
  • Minimal or structured wagering enables them to generate transaction histories that appear legitimate.
  • Withdrawals are labeled as 'winnings,' effectively masking the origin of funds through continued layering across multiple jurisdictions.
T0107.001
|
|
  • Criminals use multiple online lottery or gambling accounts to buy tickets with illicit funds, splitting transactions across different platforms and IP addresses.
  • By dispersing ticket purchases, it becomes harder for authorities to detect and link frequent or high-volume play to suspicious finances.
  • Winnings can be claimed directly or funneled through third parties, further masking who truly benefits from the funds.
T0107.003
|
|
  • Criminals deposit illicit funds into one or more online gambling accounts with minimal KYC requirements.
  • They deliberately lose chips to a co-conspirator’s account, effectively transferring the illegal funds.
  • The co-conspirator then withdraws or “cashes out” these chips as gambling winnings, falsely legitimizing their origin.
  • Multiple or newly created accounts can be used to repeatedly structure, conceal, and fragment these transfers.
T0107.005
|
|
  • Criminals create betting accounts on sportsbook platforms and deposit illegally obtained capital.
  • By fixing the match outcome, wagers are almost guaranteed to win, masking the original illegitimate source.
  • Rapid fund movement after the 'winning' bets pay out hinders detection, as these transactions appear consistent with normal betting activities.
  • Criminals deposit illegally obtained funds into online betting platforms with minimal AML scrutiny.
  • Later, they withdraw 'winnings' as legitimate proceeds, making it difficult for compliance teams to trace the illicit origins of money passing through sports wagers.
  • Criminals exploit lax or insufficient remote ID checks on gambling platforms by repeatedly submitting stolen or doctored identity documents.
  • Once the platform’s verification is bypassed, multiple accounts can be opened from the same device or IP address using different identities.
  • These accounts effectively store and move value through bets and withdrawals, concealing illicit origins under minimal scrutiny.