Bond Investments

Criminals purchase government or corporate bonds to transform illicit funds into seemingly legitimate instruments. Some also acquire insurance-based bond products, viewing them as safe repositories for illicit capital. At times, bonds are bought through third-party accounts or placed under relatives’ names, obscuring beneficial ownership and complicating due diligence. Once acquired, funds are layered through interest and redemption proceeds, which appear as ordinary investment returns. The perceived stability of reputable bond markets helps these illicit flows blend in, allowing criminals to present the proceeds of crime as lawful income.

[
Code
T0061.004
]
[
Name
Bond Investments
]
[
Version
1.0
]
[]
[
Risk
Customer Risk, Product Risk
]
[
Created
2025-02-27
]
[
Modified
2025-04-02
]

Tactics

ML.TA0009
|
|

Criminals convert illicit funds into bonds and then collect interest or redemption payouts as seemingly legitimate earnings.

Risks

RS0001
|
Customer Risk
|

Criminals obscure beneficial ownership by placing bonds under the names of relatives or third parties, complicating customer due diligence and hindering the identification of the actual source of funds.

RS0002
|
Product Risk
|

Criminals exploit the widely recognized stability and legitimacy of bonds, including insurance-based bond products, to allow large amounts of illicit capital to blend in with normal investment flows. Since these instruments are viewed as safe, suspicious capital inflows are less likely to be flagged. Additionally, interest or redemption proceeds can be presented as ordinary returns, further obscuring the illicit origin.

Indicators

IND01628
|

Frequent purchases of bonds with cash or cash equivalents that are inconsistent with the customer's known financial profile.

IND01629
|

Unusually high volume of bond transactions lacking any documented business or investment rationale.

IND01630
|

Redemption of bonds shortly after purchase, particularly when it results in financial loss or minimal gain.

IND01631
|

Use of multiple accounts, intermediaries, or corporate entities to purchase bonds, obscuring the true ownership or source of funds.

IND01632
|

Customers investing in bonds that do not align with their stated investment strategy or risk profile.

IND01633
|

Interest payments from bonds being transferred to accounts in jurisdictions with lax AML regulations.

IND01634
|

Sudden increase in bond investment activity by individuals or entities with no prior history of such investments.

IND01635
|

Bonds purchased using funds from accounts with limited transaction history or sudden large deposits.

IND01636
|

Use of complex bond structures or derivatives that lack transparency in ownership or origin of funds.

IND01637
|

Frequent changes in bond ownership, beneficiary designations, or transfers between related parties without a clear business purpose.

IND01638
|

Frequent purchases of high-value bonds despite an unexplained or insufficiently documented source of funds.

IND01639
|

Interest income from bonds significantly exceeding the customer's usual income or business activities.

IND01640
|

Complex or opaque ownership structures for entities purchasing bonds, making it difficult to identify the ultimate beneficial owner.

IND01641
|

Bond investments made through jurisdictions known for lax regulatory oversight or secrecy laws.

IND01642
|

Pattern of bond redemption proceeds being transferred to unrelated or offshore accounts.

IND01643
|

Customer shows reluctance to provide information about the source of funds used for bond purchases.

IND01644
|

Bonds purchased or held in the name of close relatives or third-party individuals, while the customer provides or controls the funds without a legitimate explanation.

IND01645
|

Large single-premium or lump-sum deposits into insurance-based bond products that do not align with the individual’s typical coverage or financial profile.

Data Sources

Offers risk insights on different regions, highlighting areas with lax regulatory oversight or secrecy laws. By detecting bond transactions or related interest payments that tie back to high-risk jurisdictions, compliance teams can flag suspicious external flows or potential regulatory evasion.

Contains official filings of earnings, taxes, and business revenues. Cross-referencing these records with substantial bond returns helps detect discrepancies, such as significantly higher interest income than reported income, suggesting potential laundering using bond instruments.

Captures bond purchase and redemption details, such as timestamps, amounts, and payment methods, across customer accounts. This data helps identify unusual patterns, such as frequent high-value bond purchases and rapid redemptions, as well as discrepancies in how funds are introduced or withdrawn. This supports the detection of layering within bond investment schemes.

Contains detailed information on account ownership, balances, and transaction histories. This data enables financial institutions to trace sudden or large deposits used to purchase bonds, detect the use of multiple accounts for concealment, and monitor related funds being moved to or from bond investments.

Provides comprehensive information on bonds and derivatives, including structural details, trading volumes, and pricing history. This data aids in identifying complex or opaque bond structures, unusual trading activity, and potentially short holding periods inconsistent with typical investment strategies.

Provides verified customer identities, beneficial ownership information, declared financial profiles, and associated risk assessments. This data helps detect mismatches between customers’ stated risk/income profiles and their bond activity, identify ownership structures that place bonds in relatives’ or third-party names, and assess unexplained sources of funds.

Includes cross-border payment details, such as jurisdictional information, currency flows, and transaction relationships, revealing if bond proceeds or interest payments are routed to high-risk or offshore locations without a clear business rationale.

Centralized records of business entities and their owners capture formations, shareholder details, and historical changes in ownership structures. This data helps expose multi-layered or shifting corporate entities used to hide ultimate beneficial owners in bond transactions.

Mitigations

Identify bond transactions involving jurisdictions known for minimal oversight or secrecy-friendly regulations. Apply enhanced scrutiny, limit certain high-risk bond purchases, and enforce additional documentation requirements for cross-border investments to reduce the risk of laundering funds through under-regulated markets.

Conduct deeper scrutiny on high-risk bond investments where multiple accounts or relatives appear as registered owners. Corroborate beneficial ownership using external data sources, verify the stated source of funds when large or unusual bond purchases occur, and investigate any ambiguous third-party involvement or repeated short-term redemptions.

Obtain and verify all relevant information for bond purchasers, ensuring that declared identities and funding sources match official records. Confirm the legitimacy of each acquisition by comparing the investor’s stated wealth and investment profile with the scale and frequency of bond purchases, flagging any mismatches for immediate review.

Implement targeted rules to detect unusual bond-related transaction patterns, such as short holding periods, repetitive high-value acquisitions funded from new or dormant accounts, or interest proceeds routed to offshore accounts. Promptly escalate any deviation from typical investment norms for investigative follow-up, focusing on potential layering or disguised fund flows.

Require documentation proving the role and legitimacy of any third-party intermediaries or affiliated entities involved with bond purchases. Impose strict controls on the movement of bond proceeds through these outside parties, verify their professional registration, and monitor transactions for back-to-back transfers that mask ultimate ownership.

Check publicly available data (e.g., commercial registries, news reports) related to bond purchasers or the corporate entities they use. Investigate discrepancies between claimed backgrounds or sources of wealth and actual findings, paying particular attention to the repeated use of relatives or proxies where formal business justification is absent.

Regularly reassess the consistency of bond activities with the customer’s stated investment goals. Track redemptions and interest payouts after purchase to confirm they align with the declared source of wealth and do not exhibit abnormal patterns, such as unusually rapid liquidations or transfers to unrelated entities.

Instruments

Criminals acquire insurance-based bond products under the names of relatives or third parties, obscuring the true beneficial owner and source of funds. By placing illicit capital within an insurance wrapper, they legitimize otherwise suspect funds. The interest or redemption proceeds then appear as regular insurance benefits, complicating efforts to trace the criminal origin of the money.

IN0019
|
|

Criminals purchase government or corporate bonds, which are categorically recognized as securities, using illicit funds. These instruments give the appearance of legitimate investments, while interest and redemption proceeds are subsequently presented as normal investment returns. Additionally, registering bonds in the names of relatives or nominees conceals true beneficial ownership, impairing due diligence and helping illicit funds blend into lawful financial flows.

Service & Products

  • Criminals purchase government or corporate bonds using illicit funds, disguising the true source of capital as legitimate investment proceeds.
  • They may place ownership under relatives or third parties, concealing the ultimate beneficial owner and complicating due diligence.
  • Interest and redemption payouts are then presented as ordinary investment returns, obscuring their criminal origin.
  • Criminals acquire insurance-based bond products to store illicit funds under insurance wrappers, making it more difficult to trace ownership.
  • Purchasing these products in the names of relatives or third parties further obscures beneficial ownership.
  • The interest and redemption proceeds from such policies are portrayed as legitimate insurance payouts.

Actors

Insurance companies issue bond-like insurance products that criminals misuse by:

  • Offering insurance-based investment instruments where illicit funds are stored under an insurance wrapper.
  • Allowing redemption and interest proceeds to appear as standard policy benefits, further complicating the detection of illicit origins.

Criminals place bond ownership under relatives or close associates by:

  • Using family member identities to obscure beneficial ownership from financial institutions.
  • Diverting scrutiny away from the true source of funds, hindering effective due diligence.
AT0041
|
|

Brokers enable bond purchases by:

  • Facilitating transactions in government or corporate bonds, sometimes unaware of the criminal source of funds.
  • Providing the infrastructure and account services necessary for investing, potentially obscuring beneficial ownership if due diligence is insufficient.

Illicit operators exploit bond investments by:

  • Purchasing government or corporate bonds with illicit funds to make them appear as legitimate investments.
  • Layering illicit capital through interest or redemption proceeds that present as ordinary returns, complicating detection for financial institutions.
AT0068
|
|

Nominees hold or purchase bonds on behalf of criminals by:

  • Masking the ultimate beneficial owner, making it difficult to link the investment to illicit funds.
  • Helping criminals layer funds through interest or redemption proceeds that appear lawful.

References

  1. Dietz, A. (2017). Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing in the Luxembourg Investment Fund Market. EIKV Luxemburg. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/162698

  2. Shanmugam B., Thanasegaran H. (2008). Exploitation of the insurance industry for money laundering: the Malaysian perspective. Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685200810867465

  3. MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore). (2018). Guidance for effective AML/CFT transaction monitoring controls. MAS. https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/Regulations-and-Financial-Stability/Regulatory-and-Supervisory-Framework/Anti_Money-Laundering_Countering-the-Financing-of-Terrorism/Guidance-for-Effective-AML-CFT-Transaction-Monitoring-Controls.pdf