Unlicensed Real Estate Brokerage

Adversaries hire unregistered or unofficial property brokers to facilitate real estate purchases or sales with minimal AML oversight. By circumventing licensed real estate professionals, launderers avoid standard customer due diligence checks or suspicious activity reporting, allowing illicit funds to enter property holdings or exit through seemingly lawful transactions with little scrutiny. This practice can be exacerbated where the legal title for real estate agents is not protected, effectively allowing anyone to hold themselves out as a broker without registration or licensing obligations. In some jurisdictions, regulators classify unlicensed or unregistered real estate intermediaries and leasing agents as high-risk channels that lack rigorous AML/CFT controls. Other areas have begun introducing measures—such as dedicated real estate stock markets and applications that estimate fair property values—to curb involvement by unlicensed brokers and reduce opportunities for illicit fund flows.

[
Code
T0133
]
[
Name
Unlicensed Real Estate Brokerage
]
[
Version
1.0
]
[
Parent Technique
]
[
Risk
Channel Risk
]
[
Created
2025-03-12
]
[
Modified
2025-04-02
]

Unlicensed Property Brokers

Tactics

Unlicensed brokers facilitate launderers' entry into real estate transactions by circumventing regulated AML checks, effectively bypassing KYC and suspicious activity reporting requirements. The primary objective is to secure property purchase or sale channels with minimal scrutiny.

Risks

RS0003
|
Channel Risk
|

This technique primarily exploits an unregulated channel by employing unlicensed real estate brokers who lack formal AML/CFT obligations. By avoiding licensed intermediaries, launderers bypass standard customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting, effectively inserting or moving illicit funds with minimal scrutiny.

Indicators

IND00658
|

Large or irregular payment methods (e.g., multiple third-party checks, wires from unrelated overseas accounts) processed through unlicensed brokers, with no documented compliance checks.

IND00659
|

Repeated high-value real estate transactions involving the same unregistered broker and multiple unrelated parties, lacking a legitimate business relationship among the participants.

IND02273
|

Property transactions executed without involving a licensed real estate broker, as indicated in closing documents, resulting in minimal or no regulated oversight.

IND02274
|

Real estate deals arranged by individuals not found in official real estate licensing databases, indicating a lack of regulated due diligence procedures.

IND02275
|

Failure to collect standard AML or KYC documentation during property closings, leading to incomplete verification of customer identity and source of funds.

IND02276
|

Property transactions facilitated by unlicensed brokers at prices significantly above or below local market norms without legitimate justification, suggesting possible price manipulation.

Data Sources

Lists professional licenses and affiliations for individuals and organizations, verifying whether a real estate intermediary holds valid licensing. This data directly identifies unlicensed brokers, supporting AML investigations where a party lacks mandatory licensure or professional standing.

Provides comprehensive records of financial transactions, including amounts, timestamps, origin and beneficiary accounts, and payment instruments. This enables investigators to identify large or irregular payments processed through unlicensed brokers, detect transactions from unrelated overseas accounts, and trace flows of funds that bypass standard AML checks.

Includes verified customer identity data, beneficial ownership details, and collected AML documentation. This resource highlights instances when real estate transactions proceed without standard due diligence, enabling the detection of deals undertaken by unlicensed brokers lacking proper KYC checks.

Contains official records of real estate and high-value asset transactions, including property addresses, dates, purchase values, and involved parties. This data helps uncover repeated usage of the same unregistered intermediary, unusual property pricing, and missing licensed broker details—key red flags for unlicensed real estate brokering.

Mitigations

Apply heightened scrutiny to real estate transactions flagged for potential unlicensed broker involvement. Verify brokers' credentials through official licensing authorities, confirm property values against market norms, and require additional documentation on the source of funds. By thoroughly assessing high-risk deals, institutions can uncover attempts to conceal illicit funds via unregulated intermediaries.

Incorporate verification of real estate broker licensing as part of standard customer onboarding and transaction reviews for property deals. If brokers are not found in official databases, require additional information from the customer about the broker’s background and verify the source of funds for both parties to block illicit money inflows.

Implement specialized monitoring rules to flag real estate transactions involving brokers whose licensing status cannot be verified. Track patterns such as repeated dealings with the same unlicensed intermediary, unusually large or frequent property trades, or property deals that significantly deviate from regional market values without legitimate justification. Investigate and escalate these transactions promptly to mitigate laundering risk.

Establish robust controls for onboarding and overseeing real estate brokers or intermediaries acting on behalf of clients to confirm valid licensing and AML compliance. Periodically review and update contracts to ensure continued compliance, and cut ties with those who show signs of being unlicensed or repeatedly violate AML obligations.

Train employees to identify unlicensed real estate broker involvement by focusing on verifying broker licensing details and recognizing red flags, such as unsubstantiated property appraisals. Ensure that employees promptly escalate any irregularities to compliance teams. Incorporate scenario-based exercises that demonstrate how launderers exploit unregulated brokers.

Provide clear guidance and materials highlighting the risks of engaging with unlicensed real estate brokers, including potential legal liabilities and exposure to illicit fund flows. Advise customers to verify broker credentials through official registries or regulatory bodies prior to finalizing transactions.

Cross-check real estate brokers' credentials with publicly available data, licensing authority sources, and industry databases. Investigate discrepancies, such as brokers not appearing in official directories or using expired license details, and escalate suspicious cases for further review or Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) procedures.

Restrict or deny financial services for real estate transactions where no valid broker licensing information is provided. Require proof of registration or affiliation with recognized real estate regulatory bodies before processing payments to ensure that unlicensed brokerage channels are cut off.

Instruments

IN0004
|
|
  • Criminals may use checks from unrelated third-party sources to purchase real estate through unlicensed brokers.
  • These brokers typically do not perform enhanced due diligence on the check origin or payer.
  • This strategy layers illicit funds from various sources, obscuring the trail and beneficial owner.
  • Criminals route illicit funds from offshore or domestic bank accounts into property transactions arranged by unlicensed brokers, bypassing regulated AML scrutiny.
  • Because unregistered intermediaries lack formal AML obligations, they often do not question incoming wires or verify the ultimate source of funds.
  • This facilitates the seamless movement and integration of tainted money into real estate assets.
IN0013
|
|
  • Unlicensed brokers facilitate property purchases and sales outside regulated frameworks, omitting standard customer due diligence.
  • Criminals exploit this gap to introduce illicit funds into seemingly legitimate property transactions.
  • With minimal oversight, beneficial ownership remains hidden, enabling the integration of illegal gains through resale or financing activities.
IN0051
|
|
  • Unlicensed real estate brokers often accept substantial cash payments without verifying the origin of the funds.
  • By sidestepping AML reporting thresholds or scrutiny, launderers effectively convert illegal proceeds into real property.
  • The lack of documented transactions further conceals the money trail and beneficial ownership.

Service & Products

  • By operating without proper licensing, these brokerage-like services avoid mandatory AML programs, failing to conduct customer identification or suspicious activity reporting.
  • Criminals can funnel illicit proceeds into property deals arranged by unlicensed intermediaries, introducing or integrating illicit funds with minimal scrutiny.
  • Purchases and sales arranged through unregistered brokers often omit proper documentation or due diligence, obscuring beneficial ownership and concealing the source of funds.

Actors

Illicit operators knowingly exploit unlicensed real estate brokers by:

  • Hiring unauthorized intermediaries who bypass customer due diligence and AML checks.
  • Channeling illicit proceeds through these brokers to purchase or sell property with limited scrutiny.
  • Concealing the true source of funds from financial institutions, disrupting automated detection and reporting of suspicious transactions.

References

  1. EAG (Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism). (2023). EAG typologies project guidelines on the listing/de-listing of terrorists/extremists and freezing of their assets. EAG. https://eurasiangroup.org/files/uploads/files/Guidelines_on_freezing.pdf

  2. MENAFATF (Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force). (2018). Money laundering through the real estate sector. MENAFATF. https://www.menafatf.org/sites/default/files/Newsletter/ML%20through%20the%20Real%20Estate%20-%20Eng-Final.pdf

  3. The Swedish Companies Registration Office, the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, the Swedish Economic Crime Authority, the Swedish Estate Agents Inspectorate, Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, the Swedish Enforcement Authority, the County Administrative Board of Skåne, the County Administrative Board of Stockholm, the County Administrative Board of Västra Götaland, the Swedish Police Authority, the Swedish Inspectorate of Auditors, the Swedish Tax Agency, the Swedish Gambling Authority, the Swedish Bar Association, the Swedish Security Service, Swedish Customs, & the Swedish Prosecution Authority. (2021). National risk assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing in Sweden 2020/2021. The Swedish Police Authority.https://polisen.se/siteassets/dokument/om-polisen/penningtvatt/national-risk-assessment-of-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing-in-sweden_.pdf