Node Exchange Provisioning (NEP) involves off-the-record exchanges of fiat currency and cryptocurrency coordinated by a small group of trusted intermediaries in criminal networks. By relying on unregulated or informal currency exchange networks that have minimal or no KYC requirements, these operators conduct transactions outside conventional banking or regulated exchanges, significantly complicating detection efforts. Through quick conversion of cash to crypto (and vice versa), criminals ensure high liquidity and conceal their operations from standard AML controls. In practice, NEP actors frequently use discreet brokers and cash couriers to move funds across multiple jurisdictions. The minimal documentation and cross-border character of such exchanges make it difficult for authorities to track flows or attribute them to illicit conduct, allowing perpetrators to adapt rapidly if detection risks evolve.
Node Exchange Provisioning
NEP
Tactics
This technique operates outside the grid of formal oversight, leveraging secrecy and trusted intermediaries to prevent law enforcement from effectively tracking or disrupting the activity.
By enabling quick conversion between cash and cryptocurrency, criminals maintain flexible and readily movable funds, allowing them to pivot rapidly if detection risks change.
Risks
Node Exchange Provisioning primarily exploits informal exchange channels that operate outside regulated financial systems. By using trusted intermediaries and minimal or nonexistent KYC measures, criminals can convert fiat to crypto (and vice versa) without triggering conventional AML controls. This off-the-grid operation bypasses institutional oversight, allowing for rapid and opaque fund movement.
This technique deliberately operates across multiple jurisdictions with uneven or weak AML enforcement. Cash couriers and discreet brokers move funds internationally with minimal documentation, exploiting cross-border gaps in oversight to further obscure transactions and avoid detection.
Indicators
Frequent, rapid cyclical transactions converting fiat into cryptocurrency and quickly back to fiat with minimal holding periods.
Transactions conducted through unregulated channels with no standard documentation or audit trails.
Repeated involvement of a small network of specialized intermediaries (e.g. cash couriers, brokers) consistently facilitating off-the-record currency exchanges.
Intermediaries with identities that cannot be validated or repeatedly appear in criminal watchlists, consistently participating in the transaction chain.
Circular flow of funds with repeated conversion from fiat to cryptocurrency and back to fiat without any clear commercial or operational justification.
Clustered transaction activity among a closed set of entities operating across multiple jurisdictions with no identifiable legitimate business rationale.
Customer profiles exhibit significant inconsistencies between declared business activities and the volume or nature of cross-currency transactions.
Direct and repeated reliance on unregulated, informal financial intermediaries to transfer funds across different currencies with no transparent origin or destination.
Multiple small or fragmented transactions that consolidate into larger unregulated cross-currency exchanges with minimal or no documentation.
Frequent cross-border physical cash movements by trusted couriers or brokers with incomplete or inconsistent documentation, preceding or following cryptocurrency transactions.
Data Sources
Compiles negative news and legal documents that may link NEP facilitators to criminal activities or watchlists. Investigators can verify whether individuals or entities repeatedly engaging in off-the-record exchanges appear in court filings or negative press.
Provides documentation of cross-border cash declarations and any seized amounts. Correlating these records with subsequent fiat or crypto movements helps identify instances where large cash sums enter a jurisdiction and are quickly converted into or out of cryptocurrency, indicating potential NEP patterns.
Aggregates publicly available information (e.g., websites, social media, news) that may reveal unregulated money exchangers, informal networks, or references to off-the-record currency exchanges. By examining this data, investigators can identify key players or brokers facilitating NEP.
Logs both inbound and outbound account activity with timestamps, amounts, and references, helping to directly correlate cash introductions at borders with subsequent cryptocurrency purchases or sales indicative of NEP methods.
Contains verified identities, beneficial ownership details, account relationships, and risk profiles. These records help detect intermediaries with limited or inconsistent documentation who repeatedly appear in NEP transactions and assess whether customers have legitimate backgrounds or risk indicators.
Includes addresses, timestamps, transaction identifiers, and amounts from public ledgers. This data enables investigators to trace how physical cash introduced by couriers is rapidly converted into digital assets or vice versa, revealing cyclical conversions, short holding periods, and cross-currency flows consistent with Node Exchange Provisioning patterns.
Captures cross-border financial flows, detailing transaction amounts, locations, and intermediary institutions. Analysis can reveal patterns where funds move among multiple jurisdictions without transparent business purposes, consistent with NEP’s rapid cross-currency exchanges.
Mitigations
Apply deeper background checks to customers engaging with unregulated intermediaries or conducting quick crypto-fiat conversions across borders. Verify broker legitimacy, confirm sources of funds, and scrutinize layering methods that mirror NEP operations. Maintain strict ongoing monitoring for unusual changes.
Collect detailed cross-currency transaction information during onboarding and throughout the customer relationship, including the role of brokers and any cross-border flows. Substantiate declared business activities against transaction behavior to detect NEP's hallmark rapid fiat-crypto exchanges outside regulated channels.
Implement specialized transaction monitoring rules to track repeated or rapid conversions between fiat and cryptocurrency with minimal holding times, focusing on potential usage of unregulated brokers or channels. Investigate flagged cyclical flows that align with Node Exchange Provisioning (NEP).
Continuously assess and monitor external partners, such as money service businesses or crypto brokers, through contractual AML clauses and periodic audits. Immediately address non-compliance or indications of NEP, ensuring no off-the-record cross-currency activities are being facilitated.
Enforce detailed reporting for large or repeated cash transactions linked to immediate cryptocurrency conversions. Verify the origin and destination of funds, and investigate incomplete or mismatched documentation that may indicate NEPs' hidden cash-to-crypto or crypto-to-cash maneuvers.
Use advanced blockchain analytics to identify short-term wallet balances, repeated interactions with high-risk addresses, and unexplained cross-jurisdiction transfers. Cross-check on-chain data with off-chain transactions to reveal NEP's unregulated intermediaries or suspicious aggregator addresses.
Leverage open-source intelligence to identify and verify the legitimacy of informal brokers, currency exchangers, and courier networks. Cross-reference licensing data and illicit activities to reveal NEP associations driven by off-the-record operations and unverified intermediaries.
Block or restrict services to unregulated exchanges or brokers, and apply strict controls to cross-currency transactions that bypass formal KYC processes. By disallowing relationships with unlicensed intermediaries, NEP's ability to operate off-the-record is curtailed.
Instruments
- Criminals rapidly exchange illicit cash for cryptocurrencies (and vice versa) through informal exchange nodes operating outside regulatory scrutiny.
- These transactions often lack KYC requirements, enabling funds to move pseudonymously and obscuring their unlawful origin.
- Once converted, perpetrators can leverage cross-border transfers or layer transactions further, making it extremely difficult for authorities to trace or disrupt.
- NEP actors move physical currency through trusted couriers or brokers across multiple jurisdictions, bypassing traditional banking oversight.
- Large amounts of cash can be exchanged for cryptocurrency with minimal or no KYC, hiding the true origin of the funds.
- The off-the-record nature of these cash transactions complicates detection, as there is little documentation or audit trail.
Service & Products
- Enable large-volume trades negotiated privately, reducing transparency and making it difficult to detect illicit currency exchanges.
- Allow criminals to move funds swiftly between fiat and crypto with minimal documentation, circumventing regulated exchange channels.
- Facilitate direct user-to-user crypto trades with minimal oversight, allowing rapid cash-to-crypto and crypto-to-cash conversions outside formal exchange mechanisms.
- Frequently operate with lax or no KYC requirements, letting criminal groups conduct transactions discreetly and evade standard AML controls.
- Provide direct fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat conversions with limited or no on-site identification checks.
- Facilitate rapid, off-the-record cash deposits or withdrawals, impeding law enforcement’s ability to trace transactions when machines operate under minimal compliance obligations.
Actors
Organized crime groups exploit Node Exchange Provisioning by:
- Coordinating trusted intermediaries to swiftly convert illicit funds between fiat currency and cryptocurrency.
- Leveraging informal exchange networks with minimal or no KYC, shielding their operations from detection.
- Conducting rapid cross-border fund movements that hinder financial institutions’ ability to track transaction flows or attribute them to underlying criminal activities.
Brokers knowingly support Node Exchange Provisioning by:
- Arranging discreet cross-currency transactions for criminal clients, often outside regulated channels.
- Negotiating deals that convert large volumes of illicit cash to cryptocurrency (and vice versa) with minimal oversight.
- Impeding financial institutions' transaction monitoring and preventing accurate identification of illicit funds.
Cash couriers enable Node Exchange Provisioning by:
- Physically transporting currency across jurisdictions without creating a verifiable audit trail.
- Delivering or collecting funds where they can be rapidly exchanged into or from cryptocurrency.
- Eliminating standard documentation processes and hindering financial institutions’ ability to trace illicit proceeds.
Informal value transfer system operators facilitate Node Exchange Provisioning by:
- Providing unregulated currency exchange services that bypass formal banking oversight.
- Executing off-the-record swaps, often with little to no documentation or KYC.
- Obscuring beneficial ownership and complicating financial institutions’ due diligence efforts.
References
GIABA (Inter-Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa). (2020). Money laundering and terrorist financing through the informal and illegal currency exchange service providers in West Africa. GIABA. http://www.giaba.org
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2010, June). Money laundering through money remittance and currency exchange providers. MONEYVAL and FATF/OECD. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Moneylaunderingthroughmoneyremittanceandcurrencyexchangeproviders.html
Swedish Police Authority, National Operations Department, Financial Intelligence Unit. (2024, September). Crypto exchange providers - Professional money launderers (Ref. No. A554.682/2024 – 423). Swedish Police Authority. https://polisen.se/siteassets/dokument/finanspolisen/rapporter/crypto-exchange-providers-open.pdf [Accessed 2025-02-03]