Criminals take illicit cash and convert it into bank drafts, cashier’s cheques, traveler’s cheques, or other official negotiable instruments—often by keeping each purchase below reportable thresholds. Because these instruments convey an added veneer of legitimacy, they typically face fewer questions when deposited or redeemed at financial institutions. In effect, this method injects undeclared currency into the banking system without triggering the usual red flags associated with large cash deposits. Adversaries may structure or fraction these purchases across multiple branch locations to circumvent detection. In some cases, large quantities of traveler’s cheques are acquired for layering or high-value purchases, allowing illicit funds to be transferred across jurisdictions with minimal scrutiny. Once purchased, the instruments can be quickly deposited or redeemed at various accounts and institutions, further complicating efforts to trace the original source of funds. Cross-border smuggling of bearer negotiable instruments also remains a recognized risk, as criminals may carry them to avoid currency declarations and shift proceeds internationally.
Negotiable Instrument Purchases
Use of Traveller'S Cheques for Placement
Use of Banker'S Cheques for Placement
Tactics
Criminals purchase official negotiable instruments (e.g., cashier’s checks, traveler’s checks) with illicit cash as an initial infiltration step, ensuring the currency enters the financial system with fewer suspicions compared to direct large cash deposits.
Risks
Criminals exploit the inherent trust, portability, and wide acceptance of negotiable instruments (e.g., cashier’s checks, money orders, traveler’s checks). By structuring each purchase under reporting thresholds and distributing transactions across multiple branch locations, they avoid the usual red flags associated with large cash deposits. This vulnerability is central to the technique, enabling illicit funds to enter the financial system under the guise of legitimate payment instruments.
Criminals can carry or send bearer negotiable instruments across borders with minimal scrutiny, evading currency declarations. This cross-border dimension exploits weaker AML controls or varying reporting requirements in different jurisdictions, further distancing illicit funds from their original source.
Indicators
Frequent purchases of negotiable instruments (cashier’s checks, bank drafts) with transaction amounts systematically kept below mandatory reporting thresholds.
Multiple negotiable instrument purchases are split across different branch locations or consecutive days, each under typical large-cash thresholds.
Rapid deposit or redemption of newly purchased negotiable instruments across multiple institutions without any verifiable business or personal rationale.
Multiple negotiable instruments from distinct payees or accounts consolidated into a single beneficiary account with no documented relationship among parties.
Customer repeatedly refuses or cannot provide required source-of-funds documentation for negotiable instrument purchases.
Large volumes of bearer negotiable instruments transported or shipped across borders without corresponding customs declarations or any legitimate disclosure.
Data Sources
- Official records of cross-border movements, declarations, and inspections, including disclosure or seizure of bearer negotiable instruments.
- Assists in detecting undeclared international transportation of negotiable instruments to circumvent currency reporting requirements.
- Provides comprehensive transaction details, including timestamps, amounts, payees, and instrument types, for each negotiable instrument purchase.
- Enables the detection of structuring patterns, such as repetitive sub-threshold purchases or deposits, and rapid redemption across different institutions.
- Contains verified customer information, beneficial ownership data, and documented source-of-funds details.
- Identifies repeated refusals or gaps in source-of-funds documentation, aiding in the detection of suspicious negotiable instrument purchases and deposits.
Mitigations
Require detailed source-of-funds documentation and expanded background checks for customers frequently buying negotiable instruments in amounts just under reporting limits. Investigate the legitimacy of their funding and business purpose when repeated or aggregated purchases appear structured to circumvent normal scrutiny.
Implement an integrated monitoring system that flags repeat negotiable instrument purchases that stay below reportable thresholds. If the same customer or related parties make multiple instrument purchases in close succession or across different branches, generate alerts for structuring. Require additional justification or documentation when suspicious patterns arise.
Aggregate negotiable instrument purchases across branches and timeframes to ensure combined values exceeding formal thresholds are reported. Link each instrument purchase to the same customer record to prevent criminals from evading CTR requirements by conducting multiple smaller transactions.
Train front-line staff to recognize patterns of repeat negotiable instrument purchases structured below reporting thresholds. Emphasize timely escalation when a customer attempts multiple purchases at different branches or refuses normal documentation, ensuring early detection and intervention.
Set daily or monthly limits on negotiable instrument purchases unless credible business needs are documented. If customers request multiple instruments in short intervals without legitimate rationale, restrict or delay additional purchases pending further review.
Instruments
- Criminals purchase traveler's checks with undeclared cash, often below thresholds, leveraging their acceptance as quasi-cash equivalents.
- These checks are more portable and generally subject to fewer questions than large cash deposits, facilitating the layering stage.
- They can also be carried or deposited across borders without the same disclosure requirements applied to physical currency.
- Bank drafts are considered secure, bank-backed payment instruments, enabling criminals to convert illicit cash into seemingly legitimate funds.
- By splitting larger sums into multiple smaller drafts, they avoid triggering scrutiny or reporting requirements.
- Once issued, the drafts can be deposited across various accounts or locations, making it difficult for investigators to trace the cash's origin.
- Because these instruments are payable to the holder, criminals exploit them by purchasing with illicit funds and physically transporting them, circumventing ownership records.
- Cross-border smuggling is facilitated as they are subject to different declaration requirements than bulk cash.
- Once redeemed in another jurisdiction, the illicit proceeds appear distanced from their original source of funds.
- Criminals purchase money orders with illicit cash in amounts kept under reporting thresholds, exploiting their reputation as lower-risk payment tools.
- These structured purchases are then rapidly deposited or redeemed at various financial institutions, disguising the origin of funds.
- Using different branch locations and multiple small-value orders obscures the total amount being laundered and evades detection.
Service & Products
- Criminals obtain cashier’s checks, bank drafts, or traveler’s checks under thresholds to avoid triggering additional scrutiny.
- These paper instruments are treated as trustworthy payment methods, allowing easy deposit or redemption at financial institutions.
- Rapid and repeated deposits across multiple branches or regions make tracing their true source more difficult.
- Criminals purchase money orders with illicit cash in incremental amounts kept under reporting thresholds.
- Once purchased, these money orders are deposited or redeemed in different accounts, giving the appearance of legitimate funds.
- Using multiple purchase locations and frequent transactions further obscures the illicit origin of the money.
Actors
Illicit operators:
- Purchase negotiable instruments (e.g., cashier’s checks, traveler’s checks, bank drafts) with illicit cash while structuring amounts below reporting thresholds.
- Distribute these purchases across multiple locations or over consecutive days to avoid detection.
- Rapidly deposit or redeem the instruments at various accounts or institutions, obscuring the true origin of the funds.
Financial institutions, including banks and money services businesses:
- Issue negotiable instruments that criminals exploit by making multiple, lower-value purchases to avoid triggering cash deposit red flags.
- Are unwittingly used to convert illicit currency into legitimate-seeming payment forms.
- Face challenges in tracing the original source of funds once these instruments are deposited or redeemed across multiple accounts or institutions.
References
FATF (Financial Action Task Force). (2009, March). Vulnerabilities of Casinos and Gaming Sector. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Vulnerabilitiesofcasinosandgamingsector.html
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2001). Report on money laundering typologies 2001-2002. FATF.https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications.html
GAFILAT (Financial Action Task Force of Latin America). (2021). Strategic analysis product on patterns, trends and alerts related to the physical transportation of cash and bearer negotiable instruments in the region. GAFILAT.https://biblioteca.gafilat.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Strategic-Analysis-of-the-Physical-Transportation-of-Cash-and-Bearer-Negotiable-Instruments-BNI-in-the-region.pdf
GIABA Working Group on Typologies (WGTYP). (2007, November). Typologies report on cash transactions and cash couriers in West Africa. GIABA. http://www.giaba.org