Services and systems designed to automate and streamline the processing, creation, management, and tracking of invoices for businesses. These offerings facilitate the entire invoicing workflow by handling invoice creation, data entry, invoice matching, and approval processes. They enhance billing accuracy and efficiency while improving cash flow management by integrating with accounting software, providing customizable templates, automated reminders, and robust reporting capabilities.
Main/
Invoice Processing and Management Services
[]
Code
PS0007
[]
Name
Invoice Processing and Management Services
[]
Version
1.0
[]
Category
Professional & Advisory Services
[]
Created
2025-03-14
[]
Modified
2025-05-13
Related Techniques
- Automated or outsourced invoice workflows can be exploited to generate inflated or duplicate invoices, launder illicit funds.
- Limited oversight of digital invoice modifications enables criminals to resubmit or alter values without immediate detection.
- Automated or outsourced invoice systems can be misused to create numerous legitimate-looking copies of the same invoice.
- These duplicates are then presented to separate payers or financiers, concealing repeated billing for the same goods or services.
- Criminals create duplicate or falsified invoices showing inflated costs, merging them into legitimate invoice workflows.
- Limited verification of invoice authenticity or line-item pricing allows over-invoicing schemes to remain undetected.
- Enable generation and management of inflated or fictitious invoices to justify over-invoicing in construction projects.
- Facilitate layering by dispersing surplus funds through ostensible expenditures and subcontractor billing cycles.
- Introduction of fabricated or altered invoices into the billing workflow to inflate transaction values or create fictitious payees.
- Erased or overwritten invoice details conceal actual beneficiaries and shield the trail of illicit proceeds.
- Criminals fabricate or alter digital invoices to hide or inflate transaction amounts, disguising illicit transfers or expenses as legitimate.
- Once inserted, these falsified invoices can be automatically validated by poorly monitored systems, allowing manipulated data to blend into legitimate workflows.
- Generate or manage invoices for non-existent call-center work, presenting a paper trail to justify fraudulent revenue streams.
- Facilitate documentation that falsely supports the legitimacy of incoming funds, obscuring their illicit origin.
- Perpetrators generate inflated or entirely fabricated invoices for consulting work, using structured platforms that mask the absence of genuine business activity.
- Automated invoice workflows create plausible payment records, reducing immediate red flags during AML reviews.
- Enables creation and management of fraudulent invoices for pretend jewelry sales.
- Repeated issuance of false invoices helps justify suspicious inflows, depicting them as legitimate commercial transactions.
- Criminals generate fictitious or inflated tuition and vendor invoices via automated systems, justifying suspicious amounts flowing into the institution’s accounts.
- Digital workflows and minimal manual checks help layer illicit funds by blending them with legitimate institutional billing processes.
- Criminals systematically create and track fake invoices for non-existent goods or services, exploiting weak verification procedures to pass them off as legitimate business expenses.
- These platforms help incorporate fraudulent transactions into corporate accounting, blending illicit funds with legitimate payments and masking the source of the money.
- Criminals produce or submit fraudulent invoices for goods or services that never existed.
- These platforms help legitimize documentation, disguising the absence of actual trade.
- Criminals generate or alter invoices that do not correspond to genuine transactions, inflating or deflating amounts to disguise illicit fund movements.
- Fictitious invoicing masks suspicious flows behind ostensibly legitimate documentation, thwarting standard AML review.
- Generate fraudulent contractor or vendor invoices tied to payroll line items, channeling illicit funds under supposed business expenses.
- Rely on automated platforms unlikely to confirm the existence or legitimacy of the contractor, enabling covert payouts.
- Criminals submit multiple or conflicting invoice records, leveraging automated systems that may not cross-verify all details.
- Such manipulation masks the real nature of goods or services exchanged, hiding true beneficiaries and revenue flows.
- Enables submission of inflated or fabricated invoices tied to rigged contracts, presenting illicit gains as normal procurement expenses.
- Complex or layered invoicing practices can conceal kickbacks and further disguise collusive arrangements.
- Fraudsters can create or alter invoices to misrepresent goods, services, or amounts, hiding the true nature of transactions.
- Tampering with invoice metadata or entries obscures oversight, making it harder to detect fraudulent disbursements or revenue.
- Fraudulent payables are generated and managed within automated invoicing systems, concealing them among genuine transactions.
- Bogus invoices are systematically tracked and approved, normalizing suspicious outflows and hampering detection.
- Criminals leverage automated invoice creation and tracking tools to generate multiple false invoices for the same goods or services.
- This supports schemes in which repeated or manipulated documentation is used to justify fraudulent claims or inflows.
- Offenders may submit fake or inflated invoices to third-party processors, relying on weak validation checks to secure inflated reimbursements.
- Repeatedly generating bogus documentation through outsourced or automated systems enables criminals to conceal fraudulent expense entries, especially when oversight is minimal.
- Facilitate the creation and management of high volumes of fraudulent or inflated invoices, a core method for claiming unwarranted VAT refunds.
- Streamline invoice workflows so that repeated or circular transactions among related entities appear legitimate on the surface.
- Criminals generate and process counterfeit or inflated invoices for farm supplies or outputs to justify enlarged subsidy claims.
- Automated invoice workflows add a veneer of legitimacy, making it harder for authorities to detect fabricated documentation.
- Attackers manipulate invoice workflows, inserting or amending invoice details so victims settle payments to the criminal’s account under the assumption they are genuine vendor invoices.
- Automated invoicing systems can be exploited if security checks are bypassed, leading to successful redirection of funds to fraudulent accounts.
- Criminals manipulate electronic invoicing systems to overstate quantities or declare illegal goods as legitimate products.
- Automated workflows can camouflage suspicious billing, enabling trade-based laundering of funds from environmental crimes.
- Platforms designed to streamline invoice workflows can be manipulated to generate or process inflated invoices supporting fraudulent tax rebate claims.
- Automated or bulk invoice management features might mask repeated overbilling if internal controls are bypassed.