Facilitating Threat Intelligence Sharing

Table of Contents

1. The Challenge: Sharing Intel Without Sharing Sensitive Data
2. The AMLTRIX Solution: A Common Language for Threat Patterns
3. Implementation Guide: Sharing Intelligence with AMLTRIX
4. Example Scenarios in Action
5. Common Pitfalls & Tips
6. Expanding the Impact
7. Conclusion

1. The Challenge: Sharing Intel Without Sharing Sensitive Data

Financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities all stand to benefit from collaboration in identifying and mitigating emerging money laundering threats. Yet, practical intelligence sharing remains elusive. Key obstacles include:

1. Privacy & Legal Constraints

   • Most jurisdictions tightly regulate the sharing of personally identifiable information (PII) or detailed account activity data across institutions. Violating these rules can incur severe penalties, making many organizations cautious or unwilling to share any suspicious activity details.
   • Even when legal frameworks allow certain types of data exchange, the overhead of redacting or anonymizing raw information can deter practical collaboration.

2. Inconsistent Terminology & Formats

   • Financial institutions have historically maintained proprietary "red flag" definitions and “typologies,” leading to confusion when cross-referencing suspicious behaviors. For example, one bank’s “structuring” might overlap only partially with another’s “smurfing.”
   • Without an agreed-upon taxonomy, any attempt to share threat patterns becomes an ad hoc process—time-consuming and prone to misinterpretation.

3. Siloed Investigations & Blind Spots

   • When institutions operate in isolation, criminals exploit the gaps between them, orchestrating cross-institution or cross-border laundering schemes that appear benign if viewed from only one vantage point.
   • Repeatedly investigating the same newly emerging Tactic or Technique at multiple organizations is inefficient, and it may take months for each to come to similar conclusions about a novel threat.

4. Operational & Resource Barriers

   • Even if the will to collaborate exists, the complexity of building secure data-sharing channels, setting up legal agreements, and aligning on anonymization standards can deter many from sustained engagement.
   • Institutions with lean compliance teams or older technology stacks may not see an immediate ROI in building robust intel-sharing capabilities.

As a result, criminals take advantage of this fragmentation, quickly exploiting new vulnerabilities before the rest of the sector can catch up. Siloed AML efforts lead to duplicative investigations, inconsistent threat definitions, and missed opportunities for synergy.

2. The AMLTRIX Solution: A Common Language for Threat Patterns

AMLTRIX is designed specifically to facilitate effective, privacy-conscious collaboration on emerging financial crime threats. At its core, AMLTRIX provides a structured vocabulary and standardized codes (e.g., **.TA## for Tactics, T## for Techniques, IND## for Indicators, etc.) that institutions can use to describe suspicious behaviors without disclosing raw transaction data or PII.

2.1 How a Common Taxonomy Solves Key Pain Points

1. Privacy Preservation
   By referencing suspicious activities through abstracted codes (e.g., T## for a layering technique), organizations share the essence of the threat pattern instead of personal details.

2. Consistency & Clarity
   A single, well-documented framework standardizes how Tactics, Techniques, or Indicators are defined, ensuring everyone speaks the same “threat language.”

3. Actionable & Machine-Readable
   AMLTRIX object codes can be directly mapped into monitoring systems—whether rules-based or AI-driven. This allows immediate updates to detection thresholds or anomaly detection models in response to new intelligence.

4. Focus on Patterns, Not Customers
   Because AMLTRIX calls for exchanging Tactic–Indicator combos rather than raw account data, institutions remain on the safe side of privacy laws. The “what” of the laundering method is shared, not the “who.”

2.2 Key Benefits & Value Proposition

• Accelerated Detection of Emerging Threats: If multiple FIs or agencies rely on AMLTRIX Tactic (**.TA##) and Indicator (IND##) codes, they quickly see patterns that might otherwise take months to piece together.
• Resource Optimization: Rather than each institution investigating the same new scheme in isolation, they can confirm or deny suspicious patterns collectively and collaborate on mitigations.
• Stronger Ecosystem Defense: As more participants adopt AMLTRIX-labeled intelligence, the overall financial system becomes more resilient to novel laundering tactics.
• Compatibility with Legal & Regulatory Standards: By limiting shared info to codes describing suspicious behaviors (instead of PII), institutions can collaborate while complying with data protection rules.

2.3 How AMLTRIX Ensures Relevance & Updates

One critical advantage of AMLTRIX is its living nature. Through community-driven feedback, new Tactics, Techniques, or Indicators are added as criminals evolve. Because the framework is versioned and maintained with broad input, organizations can rely on it to remain current—and know that the shared intelligence references remain consistent for all participants.

3. Implementation Guide: Sharing Intelligence with AMLTRIX

Below is a practical, step-by-step approach for institutions and regulatory bodies looking to set up or refine a threat intelligence sharing mechanism anchored by AMLTRIX references.

Step 1: Adopt AMLTRIX as the Common Reference

1. Agree on Using AMLTRIX Codes
   • Collaborating entities commit to describing suspicious activities via Tactics (**.TA##), Techniques (T##), Indicators (IND##), etc., along with minimal contextual data.
   • For instance, "We are seeing layering attempts (T##) in cross-border wires labeled with repeated small deposit indicators (IND##)."
2. Outline Minimal Data Fields
   • Decide which non-sensitive data points are relevant (e.g., date range, approximate volume, impacted channels (PS##), or suspicious actor types (AT##)) without including names, account IDs, or transaction IDs.

Step 2: Establish Secure, Compliant Sharing Channels

1. Develop Anonymized Structures
   • Build standard templates or encrypted forms for exchanging T## + IND## combos, high-level frequency metrics, and general impacted geographies. Keep all personal details masked.
2. Deploy Legal & Technical Safeguards
   • Use encrypted channels, formal NDAs or data-sharing agreements. Clarify usage restrictions (like not distributing shared intel to outside parties) and define steps for conflict resolution if disputes arise.

Step 3: Define Shared Intelligence Formats & Protocols

1. Technique–Indicator Combos
   • Example: "Technique T## (Trade-based layering related technique) with Indicator IND## (multiple invoice discrepancies)." Summarize time ranges or typical transaction volumes if possible.
2. Contextual Risk or Actor References
   • Where relevant, mention Actors (AT##) or Products/Services (PS##). E.g., “This T## approach often uses mobile wallet services (PS##).”
3. Set Reporting Cadence
   • Decide on monthly bulletins, near-real-time alerts, or a combination. Encourage consistent follow-ups or escalations for particularly urgent Tactics.

4. Example Scenarios in Action

Scenario 1: Cross-Institution Alert on Funnel Accounts
A midsize bank consistently tags repeated small transfers as T## (structuring) plus IND## (frequent small deposits) in their internal monitoring logs. Noticing an uptick in these patterns, they anonymize the findings—removing PII and referencing only T## + IND## combos—to share with a partner bank. Both realize the funnel accounts appear to span multiple branches and coordinate around the same time windows, suggesting a coordinated laundering ring. Armed with this intelligence, they refine detection rules and jointly escalate the threat to regulators, each using consistent AMLTRIX codes.

Scenario 2: Regulator Advisory Based on AMLTRIX
A Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) uncovers a new layering approach involving Actors (AT##) suspected of “transaction structuring across prepaid cards (PS##).” By issuing an advisory that references T## or IND## codes—rather than specifics of each suspicious account—the FIU enables financial institutions to swiftly integrate fresh red flags into daily monitoring, without disclosing personal transaction data.

Scenario 3: Multi-Agency Collaboration to Thwart Crypto Laundering
Several crypto exchanges note suspicious usage of certain mixing services—mapped to T## (cryptocurrency obfuscation technique) plus IND## (frequent micro withdrawals). They share these anonymized patterns with a national regulator, who then relays them to major FIs. This triggers a sector-wide update to detection thresholds for repeated, small crypto movements (IN## for the instrument type). Criminals lose the advantage of these channels almost overnight.

5. Common Pitfalls & Tips

6. Expanding the Impact

6.1 Multi-Jurisdiction Networks

Because criminals rarely limit themselves to one territory, institutions across borders can rapidly piece together cross-border laundering schemes. The use of universal codes (T##, IND##, etc.) allows them to see a bigger picture collectively.

6.2 Adaptive Defense

Whenever an institution or regulator identifies a new Tactic or Indicator, participants can promptly update their detection rules (whether rule-based or AI-driven). This collaborative approach means criminals have fewer “safe havens.”

6.3 Strengthened Public–Private Partnerships

AMLTRIX-coded intelligence fosters proactive synergy among banks, FinTechs, regulators, and law enforcement, offering consistent references for suspicious patterns. As trust grows, more advanced data sharing (e.g., aggregated risk event stats) becomes feasible.

6.4 Potential for Shared Synthetic Data

With labeling standardized, some FIs may develop synthetic or masked datasets for advanced analytics testing—beneficial for ML model training without exposing real PII. AMLTRIX codes keep everything interpretable across institutions.

7. Conclusion

Facilitating threat intelligence sharing through a common AML knowledge framework goes beyond simply trading red flags. By adopting a consistent taxonomy (**.TA## for Tactics, T## for Techniques, IND## for Indicators, etc.) and embedding privacy-conscious protocols, institutions can:

• Spot emergent laundering tactics sooner,
• Reduce duplicative investigations, and
• Strengthen their collective response to sophisticated criminal networks.

This collaborative strategy not only helps each entity protect itself but also bolsters the overall resilience of the financial ecosystem, positioning all participants to remain one step ahead of evolving threats.

Back to Top