Improving AML Risk Assessment & Management

Table of Contents

1. Why Integrate AMLTRIX Into Your Risk Framework?
2. Key Benefits
3. Implementation Steps
4. Example Scenarios
5. Potential Pitfalls & Tips
6. Expanding the Impact
7. Conclusion

1. Why Integrate AMLTRIX Into Your Risk Framework?

1. Evidence-Based Priority Setting
   Map known criminal Tactics and Techniques directly to your product lines and channels. This ensures you’re focusing on genuinely relevant threats rather than hypothetical scenarios.

2. Structured Analysis
   By aligning your institutional risk approach (covering product, channel, customer, and jurisdictional risks) with AMLTRIX categories (Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, Actors, Services, etc.), you eliminate ambiguities in how each threat is assessed and mitigated.

3. Dynamic Updates
   AMLTRIX is community-driven and continuously updated, ensuring your risk assessments remain current with emerging threats.

4. Regulatory Alignment
   Regulators value a risk-based approach. Demonstrating that your risk ratings and control measures map cleanly to recognized laundering Techniques and Indicators can simplify audits and reinforce compliance.

2. Key Benefits

• High-Impact Controls: Focus resources on the Tactics and Techniques most likely to occur in your environment.
• Unified Risk Language: Use AMLTRIX references (e.g., T0001, IND00719) to standardize how each department categorizes threats.
• Reduced Overlap & Gaps: Evaluate if multiple controls aim at the same Technique or if critical Tactics have little coverage.
• Auditable & Explainable: Show internal and external stakeholders precisely how each risk rating was assigned.

3. Implementation Steps

3.1. Inventory & Classify Existing Risks

1. Collect Current Risk Assessments: Gather your enterprise risk registers, departmental risk matrices, or manual risk worksheets.
2. Identify Risk Categories: Sort them by product, channel, customer profile, or jurisdiction. Note any explicit references to known laundering methods.
3. Spot Missing Details: See if certain Tactics (e.g., layering) or known suspicious indicators are not reflected.

3.2. Map Risks to AMLTRIX Tactics & Techniques

1. Align Existing Risks to Tactics: Determine which AMLTRIX Tactics (the “why”) each risk references, if any. For example, high-value cross-border payments may point to “Integration” Tactics.
2. Drill Down to Techniques: For each Tactic, link the relevant Techniques that criminals use in your context (e.g., "Structuring" or "Shell Companies").
3. Factor in Actors & Services: If your risk assessment mentions money mules or digital wallets, find the corresponding AMLTRIX Actor or Service references to refine risk evaluations.

3.3. Incorporate Indicators & Value Instruments

1. Review AMLTRIX Indicators: Each Tactic/Technique has associated red flags. Compare them against your risk statements to ensure coverage.
2. Account for Value Instruments: Criminals may prefer certain mediums (cash, prepaid cards, crypto). If these instruments are relevant, reflect them in your risk ratings and controls.

3.4. Score & Prioritize Based on Adversarial Behaviors

1. Assess Probability & Impact: For each Tactic or Technique, estimate how likely it is given your product lines and how severe the impact could be.
2. Link to Institutional Tolerance: If certain products (like trade finance) rank highly in your risk appetite framework, tie them more tightly to relevant AMLTRIX-coded Tactics.
3. Document Rationale: Record how you arrived at each score—use AMLTRIX references to show the specific behaviors or red flags that informed the rating.

3.5. Identify & Enhance Mitigations

1. Check AMLTRIX Mitigation Suggestions: Each known Technique usually has recommended controls. Align your existing policies or design new measures accordingly.
2. Close Control Gaps: If you find an uncovered Technique (e.g., Online Gambling) missing a dedicated control, design or adapt one based on AMLTRIX insights.

3.6. Validate & Update Periodically

1. Scenario Testing: Conduct “what-if” exercises or simulated suspicious events to gauge if your newly refined risk ratings and controls hold up.
2. Feedback Loops: Incorporate real-world data—like suspicious activity alerts or near misses—and see if your risk model adjusts accordingly.
3. Track AMLTRIX Updates: As new Techniques or Indicators are added, see if they pertain to your products or channels. Update your risk documentation accordingly.

4. Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Trade Finance Vulnerabilities

A mid-sized bank’s risk register flags “trade finance” as a broad threat without specifying which laundering methods apply. By mapping to AMLTRIX Tactics, the bank discovers multiple relevant Techniques (e.g., “Invoice Manipulation”) and Indicators (e.g., IND01015 for mismatched documentation). They revise their risk assessment to reflect this detail, design new controls, and allocate staff accordingly.

Scenario 2: Revisiting Crypto-Related Risks

A fintech re-checks its AML risk matrix, noticing “crypto transactions” is lumped into a single high-risk category. Using AMLTRIX references, they differentiate Tactics around “Placement using crypto mixers” vs. “Structuring across multiple wallets,” adopting more granular risk ratings and improved detection thresholds for each.

5. Potential Pitfalls & Tips

6. Expanding the Impact

Once you’ve embedded AMLTRIX references in your institution’s risk assessment, consider:

• Linking Risk Scores to Detection: AMLTRIX-coded Tactics or Techniques can feed into rule thresholds or AI features. Higher-risk behaviors get stricter thresholds or enhanced oversight.
• Training & Awareness: Share Tactic- and Technique-specific insights with compliance staff or investigators. They’ll more quickly spot patterns in daily operations.
• Regulatory Reporting: Align your Enterprise-Wide Risk Assessment (EWRA) or specialized product risk reports to AMLTRIX, demonstrating a coherent risk-based approach.

7. Conclusion

A data-driven, adversarial-focused AML risk assessment ensures institutions allocate resources to the threats that matter most—not just theoretical or headline-grabbing issues. By mapping each risk to AMLTRIX’s Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, Actors, and Value Instruments, you can:

• Show regulators a clear, evidence-based rationale for your controls.
• Proactively adapt whenever new laundering methods emerge.
• Keep the entire enterprise (compliance, IT, risk management) aligned under one consistent, open-standard knowledge framework.

When AMLTRIX underpins your AML risk assessments, you move from broad-stroke guesswork to precision targeting—identifying where laundering threats truly lie and applying your strongest defenses right where they’re needed most.

Back to Top