⚠️ Deprecated Page
This page has been deprecated in favor of a newer, expanded use case.
Please refer to Enhancing AML Detection & Monitoring for the most current guidance on improving detection pipelines and monitoring systems.
AMLTRIX empowers financial institutions to systematically evaluate, enhance, and align their AML rules with real-world adversarial Tactics and Techniques. This structured approach fosters more accurate detection of suspicious activities, ultimately strengthening defenses against money laundering and terrorism financing.
Inventory Existing Rules
Action: The compliance team compiles a list of current AML rules such as threshold-based transaction alerts, monitoring for high-risk jurisdictions, enhanced due diligence triggers, or other. This step sets the foundation (so called "AS-IS") before evaluating them against adversarial behaviors described in AMLTRIX framework.
Classify “Why” (Tactics)
Each rule is reviewed in the context of its purpose (e.g., “detecting layering” or “preventing fraudulent customer onboarding”). Teams align the rule’s intent with known Tactics in AMLTRIX. Understanding the overarching Tactics behind each rule provides a clearer picture of the rule’s intent and helps identify whether any crucial Tactics remain uncovered.
Identify the “How” (Techniques)
For every AML rule, the compliance team examines which adversarial Techniques in AMLTRIX it aims to detect (e.g., structuring, shell company, funnel accounts). Linking a rule to a specific “how” action offers precision—helping ensure that the rule effectively addresses a known criminal method, rather than overlapping vaguely with other controls.
Spot Gaps via Indicators
Action: Using AMLTRIX’s Indicators the team verifies whether each rule covers all essential triggers. If a rule is missing key Indicators associated with a Technique, they note the gap. This check ensures that each rule accounts for known early-warning signs—reducing false negatives and preventing criminals from slipping through coverage gaps.
Assess Relevant Risks
The compliance team cross-references each rule with the Risks catalog in AMLTRIX (e.g., product, channel, internal, customer, or jurisdictional risks). By highlighting which specific Risks the rule mitigates, the institution can see if critical risk areas remain insufficiently covered and adjust its controls accordingly.
Incorporate Actors and Services
Each rule is also examined in the context of known Actors (e.g., money mules, shell companies, professional facilitators) and Products/Services taxonomies in AMLTRIX. This helps identify whether certain rules need to be expanded or refined for high-risk product lines or specific criminal Actor types —ensuring more granular monitoring where it matters most.
Align Mitigations
AMLTRIX links each identified Technique to recommended Mitigations. The team checks whether the existing AML rule incorporates these suggested Mitigations or if adjustments are necessary. Ensuring that the rule directly addresses recommended Mitigations enhances its effectiveness, allowing for quick improvements to controls that are underperforming.
Validate Efficacy and Coverage
The team runs scenario testing to validate that each AML rule catches corresponding Techniques and Indicators in real or simulated data from the institution’s transaction monitoring system. By validating coverage in practice, the institution can confirm rule effectiveness or pinpoint where fine-tuning is required.
Document and Update AML Rules
All findings—such as newly mapped rules, discovered gaps, additional Indicators, and improved Mitigations—are documented. Any outdated rules or duplicates are flagged for retirement or modification. Community members update the AMLTRIX thus it ensures that new insights feed back into the system, keeping AML strategies agile and responsive to emerging criminal methods. Knowing that compliance teams could schedule periodic reviews to track changes in regulations, criminal techniques, and institutional product offerings.
Organizations iterate through the mapping process upon designated periods or whenever new adversarial techniques or indicators arise. This ongoing cycle of updates helps the institution stay ahead of evolving threats, maintaining AML defenses aligned with the latest adversarial behaviors.