Main/

Establishing a Common AML/CFT Language

Table of Contents

  1. Why a Shared Language Matters
  2. Key Benefits
  3. Who Should Drive It
  4. Implementation Steps
  5. Example Scenarios
  6. Potential Pitfalls & Tips
  7. Expanding Impact
  8. Conclusion

1. Why a Shared Language Matters

Organizations often default to fragmented terminology when describing money laundering. In one department, “shell entity” means a dormant corporation; in another, it’s an “offshore vehicle.” Elsewhere, “EDD” might only reference enhanced ID checks, while others see it as a full investigative workflow. This extends beyond suspicious behaviors to data sources, mitigations, actors, services, and value instruments:

  • Confusion & Delays
    Inconsistent labeling of products or data sets can slow cross-department communication.

  • Data & Analytics Bottlenecks
    AI and transaction monitoring tools rely on clear, consistent definitions. Overlapping synonyms derail model training.

  • Siloed Knowledge
    Without a unified language, operational teams, risk managers, and IT all re-interpret the same concepts differently—wasting time and risking missed red flags.

AMLTRIX attempts to solve these issues as a machine and human readable knowledge graph, not merely a glossary—covering Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, Mitigations, Data Sources, Actors, Value Instruments, Services, and Risks. By standardizing how every AML dimension is named and structured, organizations move from ad-hoc terminology to structured, shared intelligence across all AML domains.

2. Key Benefits

  1. Eliminate Ambiguity Across All AML Dimensions
    Whether labeling suspicious Techniques (“Structuring”) or specifying Value Instruments (“Bearer Bonds”), AMLTRIX can be used to ensure uniform definitions.

  2. Faster, Clearer Collaboration
    Teams and external partners reference one consistent taxonomy, reducing confusion in joint investigations or policy decisions.

  3. Prevent Overlaps & Blind Spots
    By mapping local jargon to AMLTRIX objects, institutions unify synonyms (“EDD,” “Enhanced Due Diligence”) and discover previously overlooked areas.

  4. Enable Smarter AI/ML Models
    Consistent labeling helps data scientists train detection algorithms more effectively on recognized Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, or Actors.

  5. Scale Externally
    Regulators or other FIs who also adopt AMLTRIX can parse your references quickly, boosting efficiency in threat intelligence sharing.

AMLTRIX Covers More Than Behaviors

Techniques (e.g., “Structuring,” “Shell Companies”) are just one part of the knowledge graph. AMLTRIX also defines:

  • Mitigations (e.g., “Blockchain Monitoring” – M0004)
  • Data Sources (e.g., “Communication Records” – DS0027)
  • Actors (e.g., “Money Mule,” “VASPs”)
  • Value Instruments (e.g., “Bearer Bonds,” “Precious Metals”)
  • Services & Products (e.g., “Trade Finance”)
  • Risk Types (e.g., “Channel Risk”)
    By mapping all these categories, you gain a comprehensive AML/CFT language—essential for detection, risk management, and investigations.

3. Who Should Drive It

Primary Owners

  • Compliance / AML Management
    Must ensure consistent usage of AMLTRIX taxonomy throughout policies, SOPs, and escalations.

  • Risk & Investigations Teams
    Align Tactics, Indicators, and Value Instruments with risk assessments, investigative playbooks, and suspicious transaction reports.

Support Enablers

  • IT & Data Teams
    Incorporate standardized AMLTRIX definitions (e.g., T0001, DS0027, M0004, VI001) into transaction-monitoring systems, data warehouses, or analytics pipelines to minimize confusion.

  • Training Specialists
    Integrate these AMLTRIX-based labels and concepts into staff training—guided by AML professionals rather than purely HR staff.

4. Implementation Steps

Step 1: Inventory Your Existing Terminology

  1. Gather Common Terms
    Document how each department names Tactics, Data Sources, Value Instruments, or Mitigations.

  2. Identify Inconsistencies Spot overlapping synonyms or contradictory definitions.

Step 2: Map Across the Entire AMLTRIX Taxonomy

  1. Select Relevant Objects
    Focus on Tactics, Techniques, Mitigations, Data Sources, Value Instruments, etc., that apply to your institution’s risk environment.

  2. Align Terminology
    See if your local jargon maps to an existing AMLTRIX object—or if multiple local terms should merge into a standard label.

Step 3: Create & Validate an Institutional Glossary

  1. Centralize & Publish
    Build a living dictionary referencing AMLTRIX codes or IDs (e.g., T0001, M0004, DS0027, VI001).

  2. Review with Stakeholders
    Confirm alignment with compliance, risk, IT, and investigations.

Step 4: Roll Out & Train

  1. Embed in Systems & SOPs
    Update GRC tools, monitoring rules, or data exports with the newly standardized AMLTRIX terms.

  2. Communicate to Teams
    Offer short micro-training or knowledge-base articles on where to find official AML/CFT definitions and object codes.

Step 5: Maintain & Evolve

  1. Assign Ongoing Ownership
    Typically, a cross-functional AML committee or compliance leadership.

  2. Track AMLTRIX Updates
    If new Tactics, Value Instruments, or Mitigations appear in AMLTRIX, adopt them if they affect your products and risk.

5. Example Scenarios

  1. Scenario A: Harmonizing EDD vs. CDD

    • Situation: One department’s “EDD” references extra ID checks only, another’s “EDD” includes in-person site visits.
    • Solution: Map both definitions to a single AMLTRIX Mitigation entry—M0002 (Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), if needed, indroduce a more detailed, internal definition. Everyone references the same code, preventing contradictory usage.

  2. Scenario B: Standardizing Data Source Labels

    • Situation: “SWIFT logs,” “Wire transfer logs,” and “Payment logs” are used interchangeably—confusing investigators.
    • Solution: Map these terms to DS0019 (Transaction Logs), referencing that code in transaction monitoring documentation and investigative guidance.

  3. Scenario C: Clarifying Value Instruments

    • Situation: The risk team flags “precious metals” differently from “hard commodities,” while investigations lumps both under “bullion.”
    • Solution: Align all synonyms to a single Value Instrument label in AMLTRIX (e.g., IN0031: “Precious Metals & Gemstones”), ensuring consistent usage across risk scoring, escalation steps, and any specialized KYC protocols.

6. Potential Pitfalls & Tips

  1. Using Terms Out of Context

    • Tip: Ensure users differentiate a Technique (“Structuring”) from a Value Instrument (“Bearer Negotiable Instruments”) or a Data Source (“Transaction Logs”).

  2. Trying to Standardize Everything Immediately

    • Tip: Focus first on high-frequency or high-impact terms. Expand gradually as staff see the value.

  3. Not Embedding Codes

    • Tip: Consider referencing dictionary definitions identified by IDs (T0001, DS0027, M0004, VI001) directly in investigation workflows, detection systems or policy documents to avoid synonyms creeping back in.

  4. No Ongoing Maintenance

    • Tip: A strong governance process—like a quarterly or biannual review—ensures new AMLTRIX updates or internal findings are integrated consistently.

7. Expanding Impact

By aligning your entire AML/CFT ecosystem—behaviors, data sources, mitigations, value instruments, and more—under one shared language:

  • Simplify Regulatory & Audit Engagement
    Auditors see that every step references recognized labels, streamlining assessments.

  • Enhance AI & Analytics
    Models trained on consistent tags yield more accurate detection. (E.g., consistent labeling for “Precious Metals” or “Trade Finance” leads to more reliable risk management.)

  • Boost Collaboration
    Exchanging threat intelligence or typology data with other institutions (or regulators) becomes easier when all parties use the same object codes and definitions.

8. Conclusion

A truly common AML/CFT language extends beyond suspicious behaviors—value instruments, mitigations, services, and data sources all require consistent naming. By unifying these under a taxonomy that is both human-readable and machine-readable, organizations reduce confusion, accelerate teamwork, and build a solid bedrock for advanced AML initiatives: more precise detection logic, risk-based strategies, and frictionless intelligence sharing.

Start small, scale intentionally, and watch how standardized definitions improve every stage of your anti-money-laundering efforts.

Back to Top