Building & Standardizing Compliance Processes

Table of Contents

1. Building & Standardizing Compliance Processes
2. Why Embed AMLTRIX into Compliance Processes?
3. Key Benefits
4. Implementation Guide
5. Connecting to Risk & Investigations
6. Example Scenarios
7. Common Pitfalls & Tips
8. Expanding the Impact
9. Conclusion

1. Building & Standardizing Compliance Processes

Financial institutions often struggle with fragmented AML/CFT compliance procedures—some teams interpret suspicious activities differently, while others follow inconsistent or siloed workflows. AMLTRIX helps unify these processes by providing a structured knowledge base of Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, Mitigations, Data Sources, Actors, Services, Value Instruments, and more. When institutions embed these references directly into day-to-day SOPs, they eliminate confusion, bolster efficiency, and strengthen regulatory confidence.

2. Why Embed AMLTRIX into Compliance Processes?

By mapping compliance activities to Tactics (the “why”) and Techniques (the “how”)—as well as relevant Indicators, Mitigations, Data Sources, Actors, and Services—institutions can:

• Unify Communication: Reduce inconsistent jargon and varied interpretations across compliance, risk, investigations, and IT.
• Ensure Consistent Decision Points: SOPs linked to AMLTRIX references clarify which red flags (Indicators) or Tools (Mitigations) must be used.
• Improve Auditability: Regulators and internal stakeholders can see how specific Tactics or Techniques triggered each compliance step.
• Adapt Swiftly: Updating SOPs when AMLTRIX adds or refines Tactics, Techniques, or Indicators is more straightforward than rewriting entire documents.

3. Key Benefits

• Streamlined Workflows: Replace department-specific interpretations with standardized references (e.g., “Indicator IND0032” or “Technique T0043”) for consistent handling of alerts, EDD, and SARs.
• Risk-Informed Processes: AMLTRIX-coded SOPs naturally integrate risk considerations—like relevant Actors, Value Instruments, or high-risk Services—ensuring the right mitigation steps.
• Clear Investigative Hand-Offs: Investigators follow a shared language, speeding case resolution and boosting accuracy.
• Regulatory Alignment: Demonstrate to examiners or auditors that compliance decisions align with recognized AMLTRIX Tactics and Techniques.

4. Implementation Guide

4.1. Inventory & Assess Current Procedures

1. Review Existing SOPs: Collect all departmental workflows for alert triage, due diligence, escalations, and reporting. Identify where terms or thresholds differ.
2. Locate Siloed Steps: Check for duplicative efforts or ambiguous references to potential laundering behaviors.
3. Identify Data Sources & Services: Note how (and if) each process references specific Data Sources (e.g., account logs) or Services (e.g., mobile app). Keep an eye out for missing references to Actors or Value Instruments.

4.2. Map AMLTRIX Objects to Compliance Activities

Explicitly align your processes with AMLTRIX Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, and more:

• Indicators: Define which red flags (IND####) prompt further review or escalation.
• Mitigations: Incorporate AMLTRIX-recommended responses (M####) into EDD or high-risk account handling.
• Actors & Services: If your workflows mention “money mules” or “prepaid card services,” map them to the correct AMLTRIX references for clarity.
• Value Instruments: Many processes need special checks for certain instruments (cash, crypto). Reference the appropriate AMLTRIX codes.

4.3. Document SOPs with AMLTRIX References

Embed the relevant AMLTRIX object IDs in each step:

• Alert Triage Checklists: E.g., if you see frequent small deposits, link it to Indicator IND#### for “smurfing” or “structuring.”
• EDD Protocols: If a case involves “Technique T0015 (Anonymous Networking),” specify extra documentation required.
• SAR/STR Templates: Investigators can reference the exact Technique or Indicator in their narratives, ensuring consistent language.

4.4. Train & Reinforce Collaboration

1. Cross-Department Workshops: Involve Compliance, Risk, Investigations, IT, and Operations. Show how to find and apply Tactic or Technique IDs.
2. Ongoing Governance: Assign a small AMLTRIX oversight group to update references whenever new Tactics, Techniques, or Indicators appear.
3. Regular Refreshers: If a new product or service is launched (e.g., mobile wallets), reference AMLTRIX for relevant Tactics/Techniques so staff know how to adapt.

4.5. Continuously Update & Refine

1. Scheduled Reviews: Align with your compliance review cycles. Update SOPs if AMLTRIX changes or if real-world alerts suggest coverage gaps.
2. Scenario Testing: Conduct mock investigations or “tabletop exercises” to verify new references work as intended.
3. Feedback Loops: Invite investigators or frontline staff to report any confusion about AMLTRIX references.
4. Feedback Loops 2: Share your insights with AMLTRIX Team and suggest revisions to improve AMLTRIX structure and definitions.

5. Connecting to Risk & Investigations

Risk Management: When SOPs incorporate Tactics and Techniques (e.g., T0001.001 - “Shelf Companies”), those risk insights feed directly into the institution’s broader risk matrix. High-risk Techniques should result in tighter thresholds or enhanced oversight steps.

Investigations: A standard compliance process ensures consistent evidence gathering. If a suspicious deposit triggers an alert referencing Indicator IND####, investigators know exactly what flagged it, how to proceed, and which potential Actors or Value Instruments to watch for.

6. Example Scenarios

Unified Alert Investigation Workflow

Before AMLTRIX, each branch used its own deposit threshold for suspicious cross-border wires. Now, triage SOPs reference Indicator IND02514 (Rapid Funds Movement) and Technique T0083 (Funnel Accounts), ensuring uniform escalation triggers. Investigators see precisely which method was flagged and apply the recommended mitigation steps (M####).

Specialized Checks for Prepaid Cards

A new product line, “Prepaid Travel Cards,” is introduced. The compliance team consults AMLTRIX to identify relevant Tactics and Techniques—e.g., T0016 “Structuring” They update the new product’s SOP with required EDD tasks (M0002), ensuring staff consistently address these known vulnerabilities.

7. Common Pitfalls & Tips

8. Expanding the Impact

Once AMLTRIX references shape your compliance processes:

• Regulatory Reporting: SAR/STR forms become more consistent—narratives tie to recognized Tactics and Indicators.
• Alignment with Detection & Risk: Tied SOPs can feed back data to detection systems, or incorporate risk-based thresholds for certain Tactics.
• Cross-Institution Collaboration: If multiple entities share standardized references, joint investigations or threat intelligence exchange is far simpler.

9. Conclusion

When institutions embed Tactics, Techniques, Indicators, Mitigations, Data Sources, Actors, Services, and Value Instruments from AMLTRIX into their compliance SOPs, they eliminate inconsistencies, create uniform investigative workflows, and streamline regulatory reporting. This common language and framework fosters a more robust AML/CFT posture, reduces siloed decision-making, and ultimately empowers teams to adapt swiftly to emerging threats.

Back to Top